Sunday, April 08, 2007

"It's a no-brainer."

To celebrate the holy weekend, I saw Grindhouse. This was a superfun movie-going experience, and I loved just about everything about it.

Remember last year when there was a debate in a comment thread (scroll down about 1/3 of the way on the linked page for the fun comments) on my blog regarding the merits of film study, especially as it relates to Quentin Tarantino? Remember how I was told I was empty and trendy? Ahh, good times. Anyway, Grindhouse helps cement my praise for Tarantino and what he is doing with film. More on that in a bit . . .

The first film, Planet Terror, is definitely the gorier, more schlocky, more B-movie of the two films. It is a non-stop extravaganza of exploding heads, disgusting zombies, machine gun legs, and cheesy dialogue.

Robert Rodriguez has incorporated scratched up film, missing scenes (to hilariously plot-jumbling effect), and intentionally poor production values into this extremely fun tribute to the horror films of the 70s. Rodriguez also scored the film, and the music adds such a layer of entertainment that at one point I think I clapped at the score. What a nerd I am.

In between the two films, of course, are the amazing fake trailers. I won't reveal too much, but they are brilliantly bad.

Tarantino's film, Death Proof, is much, much different. It starts off very slowly, with a lot of Tarantinoesque dialogue, which is entertaining, but a bit jarring after the nonstop action of the previous feature. I found myself wondering what he was doing. Kurt Russell is great as Stuntman Mike, who kills women with his car. But unlike the comic violence of the first film, the first big car accident that happens here is anything but fun. It is gruesome and harsh and sad.

But Tarantino does nothing unintentionally. I started to love how he was playing with audience expectations. I could write a whole essay about his conscious decision to stop using the scratched-up film technique that he uses at the beginning of the film (and that Rodriguez uses throughout). The movie evolves into less and less of a B-movie. Even with a supposed formula movie, Tarantino does the unexpected.

But then, the last 20 minutes happen. This may be the most fun 20 minutes I have seen on film in a long time. And the final shot brilliantly returns to the B-movie cheese.

Grindhouse is excellent.

12 Comments:

At 8:03 PM, Blogger Josh posited...

i had a lot of fun going to grindhouse. little too much girl talk in death proof but i still liked it a lot.

 
At 11:38 PM, Blogger Jason posited...

wow. first time I tried to read this post I got totally sidetracked reading that archived post and forgot about this one.

 
At 5:17 PM, Blogger CoachDub posited...

Yeah, it is a fairly entertaining thread.

 
At 8:07 PM, Blogger Josh posited...

did no one else see this or what? i had max get tickets early in the day for the last showing on opening night and when we got there there were like 15 people in the theatre, ten of whom i knew.

in conclusion, how was 300 sold out and not this? 300 was about 1/6 the movie this was

 
At 9:14 PM, Blogger CoachDub posited...

Yeah, it is a sad state of affairs when Are We Done Yet? makes more money than Grindhouse.

 
At 9:50 PM, Blogger Jason posited...

If this movie is only six times better than 300, I don't know if it's really worth watching...

 
At 1:00 AM, Blogger matt posited...

i really liked the movie a whole bunch.

wang, i would really like to hear about why tanantino kept switching film quality, because that was something i noticed and was confused about.

another thing, i really didn't like the girl talk a whole lot, but when you used the words "tarantinoesque dialogue," something just clicked in my head and i made a comparison between deathproof and the diner scene in resevoir dogs. i kinda feel a little bright.

finally, kurt russell is the man and he really should have done something to kill that girl from rent. not rosario, but the other one who kept getting on my nerves.

i wish i could write pretty reviews like you do mr. w.

 
At 3:17 AM, Blogger matt posited...

man, i never knew that thread even happened. im really glad that you are really smart w, because if someone came at me like that, i really wouldn't have had the knowledge to defend myself. however...im working on that

 
At 3:03 PM, Anonymous Anonymous posited...

not gonna lie josh, i was surprised as well as how empty the theatre was. honestly, it seemed like everyone that i talked to after seeing it on friday said that they wanted to see it after hearing what everyone else who went say about it. hmmmm. . .

 
At 3:27 PM, Anonymous Anonymous posited...

I know I am a few days late with this post, but I took the time to read the rant by "Kali's friend Nick" (I had to stay up to date on the blog scene now that I am back at school). He definitely seems like a smartie pants, and one of those guys who is easy to dislike.

The comment that was most bothersome to me, an amateur art historian was, "Another thing people haven’t seemed to realize... he makes ACTION films. That’s like finger painting to the art world!"

This dork obviously has not studied art very carefully. Finger Painting is a very respected style. Lucian Freud and Chuck Close both used finger painting and those works are considered some of their masterpieces.

 
At 11:42 PM, Blogger jobble posited...

hmm not gonna lie, but I;m guess I'm not really into what goes into making a movie and that stuff. I just liked movies to be entertained. Not saying that I hate when I movie makes you think, on the contrary I enjoy that. That being said, my first reaction when I saw a trailer for grindhouse; that looks like a horrible movie.

 
At 11:43 PM, Blogger jobble posited...

oh and one more thing. Reation when I saw the trailer for 300: oh friggen sweet. seriously, I thought of those 3 words, in that order.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home