Monday, June 11, 2007

Non-lethal but fabulous

I had a fun (but tiring) weekend in Indianapolis babysitting my three nephews. We filled the days with fun activities, and it was great to spend so much time with them, but watching an 8 year old, a 5 year old, and a 3 year old can be draining! Fortunately my cousin went down with me to help out. A good experience, and I am glad my brother and sister-in-law could get away for the weekend.




Elsewhere . . . I saw this news item today, and at first I thought it was a fake news story:

Pentagon Confirms It Sought To Build A 'Gay Bomb'

(CBS) BERKELEY, Calif. A Berkeley watchdog organization that tracks military spending said it uncovered a strange U.S. military proposal to create a hormone bomb that could purportedly turn enemy soldiers into homosexuals and make them more interested in sex than fighting.

Pentagon officials on Friday confirmed to CBS station KPIX-TV in San Francisco that military leaders had considered, and then subsequently rejected, building the so-called gay bomb.

Edward Hammond, of Berkeley's Sunshine Project, had used the Freedom of Information Act to obtain a copy of the proposal from the Air Force's Wright Laboratory in Dayton, Ohio.

As part of a military effort to develop non-lethal weapons, the proposal suggested, "One distasteful but completely non-lethal example would be strong aphrodisiacs, especially if the chemical also caused homosexual behavior."

The documents show the Air Force lab asked for $7.5 million to develop such a chemical weapon.

"The Ohio Air Force lab proposed that a bomb be developed that contained a chemical that would cause enemy soldiers to become gay, and to have their units break down because all their soldiers became irresistibly attractive to one another," Hammond said after reviewing the documents.

"The notion was that a chemical that would probably be pleasant in the human body in low quantities could be identified, and by virtue of either breathing or having their skin exposed to this chemical, the notion was that soldiers would become gay," explained Hammond.

The Pentagon told KPIX-TV that the proposal was made by the Air Force in 1994.

"The Department of Defense is committed to identifying, researching and developing non-lethal weapons that will support our men and women in uniform," said a DOD spokesperson, who indicated that the "gay bomb" idea was quickly dismissed.

However, Hammond said the government records he obtained suggest the military gave the plan much stronger consideration than it has acknowledged.

"The truth of the matter is it would have never come to my attention if it was dismissed at the time it was proposed," he said. "In fact, the Pentagon has used it repeatedly and subsequently in an effort to promote non-lethal weapons, and in fact they submitted it to the highest scientific review body in the country for them to consider."

Military officials insisted Friday to KPIX-TV that they are not currently working on any such idea and that the past plan was abandoned.


But the difference between an April Fool's joke and a real story can get blurry when the government is involved.

3 Comments:

At 8:30 AM, Blogger undulatingorb posited...

I propose they use the History of the World Part I method and use a giant doobie that gets the enemy high.

 
At 6:01 PM, Blogger gregariousmime posited...

It sounds like a couple of military officials have been reading too much really, really bad science fiction.

 
At 9:19 AM, Anonymous Bonnie posited...

I thought the same thing when I heard this on the radio. When they called it a "gay bomb" I figured it had to be a hoax, but then when they explained what it was, it sounded like, rather than turn them gay, it would be like forcing them to take a lot of Esctacy, which might not be the worst idea...Brings a whole new twist to "Make love, not war"...That's assuming we wouldn't kill them afterwards, of course, which I'm sure we would. :-(

 

Post a Comment

<< Home